On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:48:25 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 10:11:35 -0400, Mafi <[email protected]> wrote:
Am 10.05.2012 02:16, schrieb Mehrdad:
Is this possible/should it compile?
If not, should I make an enhancement request for it? It's been
something
that would've been useful in a ton of situations for me...
void process(R)(R items, size_t maxCount = items.length)
{
}
Solution:
void process(R)(R items) {
process(items, items.length);
}
void process(R)(R items, int maxCount);
Is such a miminal syntactic sugar addition worth it?
The same could be said for current default arg feature. If it's worth
it there, why not here?
And BTW, it's not just sugar -- you are saving a function call and
unnecessary code space.
-Steve
