Re: Optional parameters referring to previous parameters?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Thu, 10 May 2012 10:11:35 -0400, Mafi <m...@example.org> wrote:
Am 10.05.2012 02:16, schrieb Mehrdad:
Is this possible/should it compile?

If not, should I make an enhancement request for it? It's been something
that would've been useful in a ton of situations for me...

void process(R)(R items, size_t maxCount = items.length)
{
}

Solution:
void process(R)(R items) {
        process(items, items.length);
}

void process(R)(R items, int maxCount);

Is such a miminal syntactic sugar addition worth it?

The same could be said for current default arg feature.  If it's worth it  
there, why not here?

-Steve