Hi Rick,

That pretty much echos my experience too...DominoEX at 11 baud seems 
to be the best compromise for 80/160.

Unless the S/N ratio is pretty high, I have not had the best of 
results with either CHIP or MT63....when S/N levels are high these 
modes work very well.

As for MIL-STD-188-141A/ALE...still looking for a place I feel 
comfortable placing a 2000 Hz wide digital signal upon....no issues 
trying that on 10/6/3, but of course noone will hear me there. 

Anxious to try it though; I sense alot of work went into it by 
Patrick.

73,

Bill N9DSJ

--- In [email protected], KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This evening the other station that I have been having a weekly 
hour 
> testing session with, met on 160 meters tonight. The QRN levels are 
not 
> bad (for 160), but there were static crashes over S9.
> 
> We used Domino EX/FEC at the 11 baud speed to start and had good 
luck. 
> We then moved up to DEX22/FEC and still found pretty good quality 
print 
> although there were some hits for some of the static crashes.
> 
> We then attempted to use 100 wpm, 1000 Hz wide MT-63. Very poor 
results. 
> Now I did not change my transmitter power and got very little print 
from 
> me. He normalized his power for 40 watts average and even then his 
print 
> on my end was very poor. I would get a few characters such as 
callsign 
> exchange, but miss a dozen or more characters in a row. We were 
forced 
> to go back to DEX22/FEC and finished up there.
> 
> I do want to try the ALE mode since it was incorporated into 
Multipsk. I 
> downloaded the program and I think I understand how to connect to 
> another station. Anyone on tonight yet? 160 and up. Butternut 
vertical 
> ground mounted here. Also, on 80 meters, NVIS inverted vee dipole.
> 
> Any Technician hams planning to operate CW or digital or voice on 
Friday?
> 
> 73,
> 
> Rick, KV9U
>


Reply via email to