Pointing out a severe engineering deficiency in a mode is not "mode
bashing"; its fulfilling one's responsibilities as an amateur radio
operator. Its no different than reporting key clicks, chirp, or
splatter to your QSO partner; most respond with "thanks for letting
me know!".
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In [email protected], "Demetre SV1UY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Jose A. Amador" <amador@>
> wrote:
> > After waiting and watching what is going on with the larger
picture,
> > I see a lot of obstination and fundamentalistic thinking in this
> thread.
> >
> > The fundamendalistic, blinds on, "taliban" quarreling going on
> about
> > POLICY is certainly out of the scope of this list to me.
> >
> > A fundamental fact of propagation, the hidden station in the skip
> zone
> > is being disregarded repeatedly.
> >
> > Period.
> >
> > Jose, CO2JA
> >
> > PS: I do own a cellphone and also watched LIVE the first steps of
> Neil
> > Armstrong on the moon.
> >
> > ---
> > Prof. Jose A. Amador, E.E., MSc.
>
> You are spot on Jose,
>
> Unfortunatelly all this name calling and mode bashing (you know,
the
> mode I support is better than yours etc) does not promote digital
> radio at all.
>
> 73 de Demetre SV1UY
>
