Glenn, 99% will always use PSK 31 ... ??? - Only 3% will try something new ?? ... !!
I assume that this survey for percentages, was completed after we switched from using teleprinters and RTTY or to Packet, AMTOR, or even back in the good old days when we stopped using AM and started using SSB (We used to call it 'Phone'). I suspect a lot more than 3% have open minds to evaluate different advances, or that 99% will always use the same mode. If not, then we would still be using separate Transmitters with a apark gap and Receivers with a crystal and Cats whisker, and sending each other Morse. At least in those days we didn't have Call Signs, .... We all knew each other, and Pontious Pilot was an Air Cadet !!! 73's John www.John4Music.TV <www.John4Music.TV> ........................................................................\ ............................................. --- In [email protected], "Glenn L. Roeser" <hillbillietr...@...> wrote: > > It seems to me that we have been down this road before comparing the different digital modes. One thing is for certain, no matter what modes there are that may do much better than PSK31, 99% of all operators will always use PSK31. > It is almost impossible to get more than 3% of the operators to try something new. > Very 73 to all, Glenn (WB2LMV) > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Vojtech bubn...@... > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, January 5, 2010 7:41:56 AM > Subject: [digitalradio] Re: IZ8BLY's PSK63F + PSKFEC31 > > Â > PSK63F is implemented in PocketDigi, source code is available. > > > PSK63F is in all cases better than PSK31. The only advantage of PSK31 is its smaller bandwidth. > > The other benefit of PSK31 is quick turnaround. But I agree that PSK63F shall be exercised and will be very useful at marginal conditions. > > 73, Vojtech >
