Jason BARSTOW wrote: > I've not seen this - can you provide a direct reference to this?
I just stated it one or two times on the list. No more details than what I wrote today. > This is very interesting, as it does seem that it might address some of the > other constraints that I am currently trying to work with/around. > I was considering adding exactly this private allocation management to the > core myself. > My motivation is twofold: > 1. Provide support for private formats (or physical representations > of existing logical formats). > 2. DRM. Yes, these would be implicitly supported. > However, if your redesign is slated for release in the near term then it > would be prefered to benefit from this or work in conjunction to acheive > this. I think you could provide some more requirements and work on the design with me. I can put my work I've done so far into a CVS branch. There's no design document, yet. But I started with the obvious parts of the implementation. > Do you have any feeling of a minimum practical timescale for your redesign > to reach release - days, weeks, months, years(!) - since I would need to > take this into account for the specific piece of work that I'm looking at. Due to other tasks I don't think it will be ready before September, but with your help and a bit more pressure on my side, we might have a release in August or July. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
