> I think you could provide some more requirements and work on the design
> with me. I can put my work I've done so far into a CVS branch. There's
> no design document, yet. But I started with the obvious parts of the
> implementation.
> > Do you have any feeling of a minimum practical timescale for your
redesign
> > to reach release - days, weeks, months, years(!) - since I would need
to
> > take this into account for the specific piece of work that I'm looking
at.
> Due to other tasks I don't think it will be ready before September,
> but with your help and a bit more pressure on my side, we might have
> a release in August or July.
:)
Well my questions are very much exploratory at the moment with respect to
DFB in general.
ie. an assesment of risk, complexity, pitfalls we might hit with the design
I have in mind.
So, there is no *definitive* requirement quite yet. But certainly I will
keep you informed offline if or when these plans develop.
In the meantime, thank you for your assistance.
Jason Barstow.
Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution of the message, or
any action taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please delete it
and contact the sender immediately. Thank you.
Denis Oliver
Kropp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To
> Jason BARSTOW
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/05/2006 16:35 cc
[email protected]
Subject
Re: [directfb-dev] Some questions:
Layers, private content, drm,
hardware windowing
Jason BARSTOW wrote:
> I've not seen this - can you provide a direct reference to this?
I just stated it one or two times on the list. No more details than
what I wrote today.
> This is very interesting, as it does seem that it might address some of
the
> other constraints that I am currently trying to work with/around.
> I was considering adding exactly this private allocation management to
the
> core myself.
> My motivation is twofold:
> 1. Provide support for private formats (or physical representations
> of existing logical formats).
> 2. DRM.
Yes, these would be implicitly supported.
> However, if your redesign is slated for release in the near term then it
> would be prefered to benefit from this or work in conjunction to acheive
> this.
I think you could provide some more requirements and work on the design
with me. I can put my work I've done so far into a CVS branch. There's
no design document, yet. But I started with the obvious parts of the
implementation.
> Do you have any feeling of a minimum practical timescale for your
redesign
> to reach release - days, weeks, months, years(!) - since I would need to
> take this into account for the specific piece of work that I'm looking
at.
Due to other tasks I don't think it will be ready before September,
but with your help and a bit more pressure on my side, we might have
a release in August or July.
--
Best regards,
Denis Oliver Kropp
.------------------------------------------.
| DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics |
| http://www.directfb.org/ |
"------------------------------------------"
ForwardSourceID:NT0003DFFA
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
