XDirectFB doesn't perform any better. It runs, and it has
vt-switching which is better than rc5, but attempting to run
dfbterm from inside xdirectfb (or vice versa) is still =
segfault. Also, when I exit, it locks the machine.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:23:13PM -0300, Lalo Martins wrote:
>
> andi, here is how it went: with CVS fusion, DirectFB, lite and
> dfbterm, I can run dfbterm (yay! it looks very nice.) BTW, the
> vt-switching is working fine for me, I'll probably stick to CVS
> just to get this feature ;-)
>
> However, trying to start a second dfbterm from inside dfbterm
> results in a segfault. I'm compiling XDirectFB right now to see
> if it performs better (perhaps the problem is in lite, not dfb).
>
> Additionally, when I *exit* DirectFB, it locks my machine. Not
> as badly as before: now it responds to ping, and pressing Caps
> or Num Lock turns the LEDs on and off. But I can't do anything
> else, including logging in via ssh.
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
Those who trade freedom for security
lose both and deserve neither.
--
http://www.laranja.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp key: http://www.laranja.org/pessoal/pgp
Eu jogo RPG! (I play RPG) http://www.eujogorpg.com.br/
GNU: never give up freedom http://www.gnu.org/
--
Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.
