Quoting Lalo Martins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 11:38:42PM +0200, andi wrote: > > >XDirectFB doesn't perform any better. It runs, and it has > > >vt-switching which is better than rc5, but attempting to run > > >dfbterm from inside xdirectfb (or vice versa) is still = > > >segfault. > > > > could you please check if you got a kernel oops after seeing the > > segmentation fault? (use 'dmesg') > > No oopses. Let me try gdb. Hmm, looks like I stripped my > libdirectfb... well anyway: > > (gdb) bt > #0 0x4013cb4a in strcmp () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #1 0x4004a100 in dfb_gfxcard_load_driver () from > /usr/local/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.19 > #2 0x400483e5 in dfb_gfxcard_join () from /usr/local/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.19 > #3 0x40047a4c in dfb_core_part_join () from /usr/local/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.19 > #4 0x40047641 in dfb_core_join () from /usr/local/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.19 > #5 0x400561a6 in fusion_arena_enter () from /usr/local/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.19 > #6 0x400470e0 in dfb_core_ref () from /usr/local/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.19 > #7 0x4002d4cd in DirectFBCreate () from /usr/local/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.19
Which of the two strings compared is invalid? -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" Convergence GmbH -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.
