Laz a écrit : > On Sunday 23 October 2005 10:41, you wrote: > > >>Get the following diffs against released 0.9.23 (directfb / dfb++) : >> >>http://nicolas.huillard.net/vdr/debian/directfb_0.9.23-2.diff.gz >>http://nicolas.huillard.net/vdr/debian/dfb++_0.9.23-1.diff.gz > > Is that second patch correct? All I can see in it is a load of "Only in > dfb++-0.9.23: " type of lines. Should it contain a debian/ directory?
Sorry, this one was just a hand-made diff, no automagically done when building the binary debs. Am I dumb ? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:DFB++$ diff -u -r dfb++-0.9.23.orig dfb++-0.9.23 Only in dfb++-0.9.23: debian That's the only output : how do I make a recursive unified diff ? >>(download released 0.9.23 then apply those patches, then build your debs >>as usual) >>(if someone have links to howtos to help me build real Debian source >>repository...) >> >>I just added the field parity patch from Mark Adams in DirectFB, but it >>does not seem to work out-of-the-box with Rolf Arhenberg's viafb kernel >>frame-buffer driver. >>I'll check what's missing. > > I'm just building directfb now. When I tried building it before (with Mark > Adams field parity patch), I got an error because it couldn't find > fbdev/fbdev.h. Is this the same error you were getting? I'm leaving it > building whilst I go out so I'll see if it fails with that for me now... AFAIK, this fbdev/fbdev.h stuff is related to the official Debian packaging, which must be independnant of the build platform. I just removed all that stuff. On my side, I got everything built, but when playing video with VDR (recording, live TV), the bottom part of the image is out-of-sync, while the top part seems to be perfect, much like the flip is not done at the right time. -- NH _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
