In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Laurence Abbott wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 18:42 +0000, Mark Adams wrote: > > > > To be honest I've no idea. I was using a lead based on this: > > > > http://forum.matrox.com/mga/viewtopic.php?t=4389 > > > > which certainly works but I never looked closely at the timing because > > I soon moved to a completely different hardware platform. Others may > > know. > > That looks like the schematic that my lead was built from (but without > the RGB switching signal because the monitor lead I built it out of > didn't have that pin!). > > I only see a picture with my TV switched to use an RGB input so I'm > pretty sure it isn't a composite signal I'm actually seeing, and I have > 'matrox-cable-type=scart-rgb' in my /etc/directfbrc.
I just tried it, because I'd already made a cable wired almost like that which I used to use with an ATI card - and it did work with that. All I had to do to make it the same as the Matrox schematic was add the bridge between VGA pins 12 and 15. But it doesn't work for my G450. It looks like the colours are coming through correctly and the TV detects it as RGB (it says so in a caption), but it's all out of sync. Does the matrox-cable-type option need a newer DirectFB than 0.9.22? Even in CVS the man page doesn't mention it. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
