On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:19:31AM +0000, Vincent AE Scott wrote: > #if laz /* Nov 28, 06:55 */ > > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 18:49 +0000, Vincent AE Scott wrote: > > > > > > My $DEITY, not only does that work, but CPU usage on mplayer isn't even > > > registering on top while playing back some mpeg2. This, as we say here > > > in the UK, is, "The dogs testicles". > > > > Really that low CPU usage with DirectFB?! I didn't think hardware > > decoding had been sorted for DirectFB yet: I'm getting between 50 and > > 70% CPU usage decoding DVB streams, which make it a little bit > > susceptible to getting a bit jittery if anything else runs at the same > > time. > > > > With hardware decoding, it would be perfect. > > > > Cheers, > > > #endif /* [EMAIL PROTECTED] */ > > I must be either going mad, or getting confused, which ever file i was > trying out before is no longer exhibiting the same behaviour now [0]. > > What i can report though, having spent the last hour going over various > files, is that some DivX's do tick over at between 7-30%. playback of > DVB-T captures (via mythtv) consume between 25-35%, a DVD OTOH grabs > 50-60%, MPEG2 via a PVR-250 around 40-50%, and static from the latter > ~60%. > > What i don't quite understand, is why DVD playback is quite so high, I'd > have thought that the DivX's (being better compressed) would take up > more CPU. ho hum.
DMA problems with your DVD drive? -- Ville Syrjälä [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
