SetLevel( ) is a level with respect to the primary - so -1 is immediately
below the primary and +1 is immediately above. Is that correct?
I'm trying to understand how the blending characteristic of the primary is
set - how to retrieve a layer interface for the primary?
Mmm, the sample I'm working from happens to create a surface directly with
DSCAPS_PRIMARY.
Is it true that I can pass this same CAP via DFBDisplayLayerConfig and
SetConfiguration, and that it's valid to retrieve a Layer interface for the
primary in this way?
What does it mean to SetLevel on the primary? (is it valid?)
Thanks,
Jason Barstow.
Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution of the message, or
any action taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please delete it
and contact the sender immediately. Thank you.
Ville Syrjälä
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
10/05/2006 16:28 Jason BARSTOW
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
[email protected]
Subject
Re: [directfb-users] Q. Layers,
placing below primary.
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:04:49PM +0100, Jason BARSTOW wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Is it possible to move one or more layers below the primary and have the
> primary surface blend with these?
If the hardware supports it.
> If so, how is this acheived?
The gfxdriver must provide SetLevel() and GetLevel() functions.
--
Ville Syrjälä
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
ForwardSourceID:NT0003DD4E
_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
