On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:24:35AM +0200, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: > Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:04:59PM +0100, Jason BARSTOW wrote: > >> What does it mean to SetLevel on the primary? (is it valid?) > > > > I suppose it depends on the hardware and driver. I don't have hardware > > that supports layer levels so I haven't really thought about it. Now > > that I do, I think the current code isn't quite sufficient for hardware > > with more that one overlay or underlay. We can control how they relate > > to the primary layer but their relation to each other is not handled... > > Their levels define the order. All levels should be a fixed range of > values, e.g. -3 to +1 if you have five layers, the primary by default > on level 0. If one layer is moved, no matter if it's the primary, it > will be at the new level, possibly moving other layers one up or down. > That way all levels are unique and the set of levels is never changed.
I misread the code. I was under the impression that the new level got stored somewhere in the layer core code and because I didn't see any restacking being done I drew the wrong conclusion. Sorry for the confusion :) -- Ville Syrjälä [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
