Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:24:35AM +0200, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: >> Ville Syrjälä wrote: >>> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:04:59PM +0100, Jason BARSTOW wrote: >>>> What does it mean to SetLevel on the primary? (is it valid?) >>> I suppose it depends on the hardware and driver. I don't have hardware >>> that supports layer levels so I haven't really thought about it. Now >>> that I do, I think the current code isn't quite sufficient for hardware >>> with more that one overlay or underlay. We can control how they relate >>> to the primary layer but their relation to each other is not handled... >> Their levels define the order. All levels should be a fixed range of >> values, e.g. -3 to +1 if you have five layers, the primary by default >> on level 0. If one layer is moved, no matter if it's the primary, it >> will be at the new level, possibly moving other layers one up or down. >> That way all levels are unique and the set of levels is never changed. > > I misread the code. I was under the impression that the new level got > stored somewhere in the layer core code and because I didn't see any > restacking being done I drew the wrong conclusion. Sorry for the > confusion :)
Right, the restacking happens in the driver. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | '------------------------------------------' _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
