Jon Radel schrieb: > Bernd Haug wrote: > >> It would be interesting, for each of you, what kind of file system the >> backups are being copied to...if your target filesystem does not accept >> hard links, it's a tough problem for dirvish. >> As already mentioned, its ext3. It is on a seperate hard disk. The partition is mounted at /mnt/backup and /var/backup/dirvish is a soft link to /mnt/backup/dirvish. > > And while we're at it, the log file matching that summary file to give a > bit more information on what rsync did. > This is today's summary: > client: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > tree: /home/xxx > rsh: ssh > Server: myserver > Bank: /var/backups/dirvish/mybank > vault: myvault > branch: default > Image: 2008-03-22_18.18 > Reference: 2008-03-21_18.18 > Image-now: 2008-03-22 18:18:49 > Expire: +14 days == 2008-04-05 18:18:49 > exclude: > *.iso > *~ > *.tmp > *.bak > cache > .gnupg > *.vmdk > SET permissions devices numeric-ids stats xdev zxfer > UNSET checksum init sparse whole-file > > > ACTION: rsync -vrltH --delete -pgo --stats -z -D --numeric-ids -x > --exclude-from=/var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-22_18.18/exclude > --link-dest=/var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-21_18.18/tree > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/xxx/ > /var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-22_18.18/tree > Backup-begin: 2008-03-22 18:18:50 > Backup-complete: 2008-03-22 19:10:07 > Status: success And this is the corresponding log file: > ACTION: rsync -vrltH --delete -pgo --stats -z -D --numeric-ids -x > --exclude-from=/var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-22_18.18/exclude > --link-dest=/var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-21_18.18/tree > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/xxx/ > /var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-22_18.18/tree > > receiving file list ... done > .ICEauthority > .Xauthority > .bash_history > .kderc > .lesshst > .nano_history [...] > Number of files: 155036 > Number of files transferred: 942 > Total file size: 60891647542 bytes > Total transferred file size: 208591096 bytes > Literal data: 13875619 bytes > Matched data: 194715792 bytes > File list size: 3239140 > File list generation time: 54.763 seconds > File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds > Total bytes sent: 686805 > Total bytes received: 8768410 > > sent 686805 bytes received 8768410 bytes 3080.38 bytes/sec > total size is 60891647542 speedup is 6440.01 It actually shows the names of all my files (I suppose it's all but I'm not really sure). I removed them. > And which version of rsync is /usr/local/bin/rsync-new anyway? > There is no file with this name. "rsync --version" gives: > rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 > Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. > <http://rsync.samba.org/> > Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, > batchfiles, inplace, IPv6, ACLs, > 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums > > rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you > are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the GNU > General Public Licence for details. The dirvish version is 1.2.
This is the output of "du -h --max-depth=1": > 58G ./2008-03-21_18.18 > 35G ./2008-03-22_18.18 > 12K ./dirvish > 67G ./2008-03-09_11.18 > 36G ./2008-03-16_10.29 > 194G . "2008-03-16_10.29" is a "--init" backup. Well, it seems to me that that not all the data is transferred but nevertheless most (but obviously not all) files are copied instead of being hardlinked. Jens _______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list [email protected] http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
