Kenneth Lerman schrieb: > A speedup of 6 thousand times is pretty good. > > Go to the vault directory and do a: > du -csh * > > I believe that will show the good news. > Good news? It shows: > 67G 2008-03-09_11.18 > 57G 2008-03-16_10.29 > 36G 2008-03-21_18.18 > 35G 2008-03-22_18.18 > 12K dirvish > 194G total Is it of any importance that dirvish is run as root?
Jens > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jens Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Dirvish user and developer mailing list" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 7:11 PM > Subject: Re: [Dirvish] Full backup every time > > > >> Jon Radel schrieb: >> >>> Bernd Haug wrote: >>> >>> >>>> It would be interesting, for each of you, what kind of file system the >>>> backups are being copied to...if your target filesystem does not accept >>>> hard links, it's a tough problem for dirvish. >>>> >>>> >> As already mentioned, its ext3. It is on a seperate hard disk. The >> partition is mounted at /mnt/backup and /var/backup/dirvish is a soft >> link to /mnt/backup/dirvish. >> >>> And while we're at it, the log file matching that summary file to give a >>> bit more information on what rsync did. >>> >>> >> This is today's summary: >> >>> client: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> tree: /home/xxx >>> rsh: ssh >>> Server: myserver >>> Bank: /var/backups/dirvish/mybank >>> vault: myvault >>> branch: default >>> Image: 2008-03-22_18.18 >>> Reference: 2008-03-21_18.18 >>> Image-now: 2008-03-22 18:18:49 >>> Expire: +14 days == 2008-04-05 18:18:49 >>> exclude: >>> *.iso >>> *~ >>> *.tmp >>> *.bak >>> cache >>> .gnupg >>> *.vmdk >>> SET permissions devices numeric-ids stats xdev zxfer >>> UNSET checksum init sparse whole-file >>> >>> >>> ACTION: rsync -vrltH --delete -pgo --stats -z -D --numeric-ids -x >>> --exclude-from=/var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-22_18.18/exclude >>> --link-dest=/var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-21_18.18/tree >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/xxx/ >>> /var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-22_18.18/tree >>> Backup-begin: 2008-03-22 18:18:50 >>> Backup-complete: 2008-03-22 19:10:07 >>> Status: success >>> >> And this is the corresponding log file: >> >>> ACTION: rsync -vrltH --delete -pgo --stats -z -D --numeric-ids -x >>> --exclude-from=/var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-22_18.18/exclude >>> --link-dest=/var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-21_18.18/tree >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/xxx/ >>> /var/backups/dirvish/mybank/myvault/2008-03-22_18.18/tree >>> >>> receiving file list ... done >>> .ICEauthority >>> .Xauthority >>> .bash_history >>> .kderc >>> .lesshst >>> .nano_history >>> >> [...] >> >>> Number of files: 155036 >>> Number of files transferred: 942 >>> Total file size: 60891647542 bytes >>> Total transferred file size: 208591096 bytes >>> Literal data: 13875619 bytes >>> Matched data: 194715792 bytes >>> File list size: 3239140 >>> File list generation time: 54.763 seconds >>> File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds >>> Total bytes sent: 686805 >>> Total bytes received: 8768410 >>> >>> sent 686805 bytes received 8768410 bytes 3080.38 bytes/sec >>> total size is 60891647542 speedup is 6440.01 >>> >> It actually shows the names of all my files (I suppose it's all but I'm >> not really sure). I removed them. >> >>> And which version of rsync is /usr/local/bin/rsync-new anyway? >>> >>> >> There is no file with this name. "rsync --version" gives: >> >>> rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 >>> Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. >>> <http://rsync.samba.org/> >>> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, >>> batchfiles, inplace, IPv6, ACLs, >>> 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums >>> >>> rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you >>> are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the GNU >>> General Public Licence for details. >>> >> The dirvish version is 1.2. >> >> This is the output of "du -h --max-depth=1": >> >>> 58G ./2008-03-21_18.18 >>> 35G ./2008-03-22_18.18 >>> 12K ./dirvish >>> 67G ./2008-03-09_11.18 >>> 36G ./2008-03-16_10.29 >>> 194G . >>> >> "2008-03-16_10.29" is a "--init" backup. >> >> Well, it seems to me that that not all the data is transferred but >> nevertheless most (but obviously not all) files are copied instead of >> being hardlinked. >> >> Jens >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dirvish mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Dirvish mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish > > _______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list [email protected] http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
