Heyho! On Wednesday 15 December 2010 15.04:33 Paul Slootman wrote: > There's also nilfs which AFAIK also does snapshots, and there are bound > to be more. > > Hence I suggest that the patch be reworked so that a more generic > approach is taken
I already said that this would make sense. I offer to do it. But I'll only do it when it is clear that it will be accepted, else I guess I'll just maintain it as a separate patch for my own use. See Keith's message - I guess that would need to be resolved first... > I'm also not entirely convinced of btrfs' stability, to tell the truth. Again: it's an option that does nothing by default. If you're not convinced btrfs fits your needs, don't use it. But this goes for every type of filesyystem. cheers -- vbi -- featured link: http://www.pool.ntp.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list [email protected] http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
