On Thursday, June 15, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote:
Hmmm ... good point. In a dynamic system, ports could get dropped or
connected "on the fly". Could you write a quick blurp about this,
somewhere before 4.9? Maybe 4.6.8 or 4.8.6?
I think we're approaching the "polishing the turd" stage...
My point was that, all the sudden in 4.9, it's mentioned that "oh, and
there can be unconnected ports". As the reading, I was caught unaware
of this as an option, since there had never been mention of it before.
Further, there was no rationale given for their existence; it was just
stated. Thus my asking if a quick sentence or 2 could be written in an
appropriate place, which at minimum talks about the possibility of
unconnected ports due to the dynamic reconfiguration possibilities.
4.6.8, or 4.8.6, or 4.8.5; there are many possible places where a quick
sentence could be inserted and would make the text less surprising
w/r.t. this one issue.
Polishing? Maybe. Discussing, understanding, and making the
architecture document more readable? Definitely. ;-) - MLD
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
