On 6/15/06 7:06 PM, "Eric Blossom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:37:54PM -0500, Michael Dickens wrote: >> On Thursday, June 15, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Eric Blossom wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote: >>>> > My theory on this document is less is more. This is addressed more to > David than to you. The semi-formal spec for the portref lists a min > and max replication count. One could infer that a min of 0 and a > max of 1 would indicate that a port was "optionally connected". I agree. This has been a really great discussion and has really helped to improve clarity and smooth some wrinkles in the document, but we should probably bring this phase to a close and start implementing. How about if I get this last set of comments into the document and then declare that the final version? I will try to stick to the "less is more" philosophy as I am editing. Thanks! Dave. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
