Sašo Kiselkov wrote: > Quoting Chris Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>A few days ago I read an article mentioning, among other things, GNUstep and >>how 'cool' (my choice of words) it would be if/when/whether 'these guys' >>(ie. the developers of GNUstep) would decide to put GNUstep on top of their >>OWN operating system instead of 'screwing around with existing systems >>resulting in symlinks all over the place' (again, my choice of words) and >>'imagine GNUstep on a Mach based kernel.' >> > > > This would, IMHO, be the biggest mistake possible: tying GNUstep to a > particular > platform. I personally love that fact that I only have to write an app once > and > then have it running with little porting effort on Linux, FreeBSD, Mac OS X, > and even ugly, but spread M$ Windows. > > Of course, I'm not against a GNUstep-only-system (hell, I already did it as my > graduation work at high school, complete with a CD-based installer, integrated > workspace, it's own package management, etc.), is it downloadable?
but care should be taken not to > make it part of the core libraries. > > Saso > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep > > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
