Hi Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 15:32 +1100, Christopher Armstrong a écrit : > Hi Phillippe > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:55 +0100, "Philippe Roussel" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 09:22 +1100, Christopher Armstrong a écrit : > > > .... > > > > > > I think it might be possible for us to use one of these, at least for > > > Ubuntu users, as we could maintain more up-to-date packages for users > > > interested in trying up-to-date versions of GNUstep. The only problem I > > > see is that the maintainer of the PPA needs to sign the Ubuntu Code of > > > Conduct. > > > > I already did that for whatever reason so if somebody is willing to > > creating the source packages, I could create a PPA. > > > > At what rate those packages would be updated ? > > I think they should be updated every time we make a new release of > GNUstep. Any less frequently defeats the purpose, and we don't have the > resources to stabilise out-of-cycle releases of the trunk repository any > more frequently than the release cycle we have. > > We could also possibly provide automatic "snapshot" releases of the > trunk repository on a daily basis for people who quickly need an > unstable version to check a bug fix. I don't think we should support > this option, unless it really helps those people who quickly want to get > an unstable version running on their system.
Agreed. So the main task for producing those packages would be to create a .deb description for each one, right ? Debian and Ubuntu already did that (or maybe only Debian did, I don't know), we should be able to use that, right ? Philippe _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
