On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:51, Martin Dietze <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Ideally the debianisation code should be moved into the source > revision control of the software whenever possible, not only for > the GS libs but also for applications based on GS. If those > packages are still maintained from my experience developers will > not object getting that 'debian/' directory from somewhere and > keeping it in the source tree, probably accepting some patches > every now and then. We've been using this approach quite > successfully with Carlos Mafra and his git repo for WindowMaker > (from which I auto-build new .deb packages whenever there are > new revisions in the git). > > Ideally again this approach would have the debianisation > from the sources leading the way for distro maintainers. > > Agreed. I would do the packaging, but I'm not comfortable enough with either debianisation process, nor with the internals of GNUstep. I've only had experience with relatively small packages, and Debian's strict policies with FHS make me uneasy. And the responsibility of being a packager is… well, a big responsibility ;) -- Regards, Ivan Vučica
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
