On 20 Dec 2013, at 12:34, David Chisnall <[email protected]> wrote:
> it definitely refutes the assertion that patches are not accepted
Sure. It’s the presentation that’s at fault. There’s an internal feeling that
GNUstep is doing stuff and welcomes external contribution, and an external
presentation of a stale bug database that isn’t linked to the source code (and
I wonder how many people find the source mirror on github and think there
hasn’t been a commit in over three months, too).
Graham.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
