On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:34 AM, David Chisnall <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 20 Dec 2013, at 11:34, Graham Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > That assertion is not demonstrated in practice. There are bugs with
> patches attached in Savannah going back years, and the patches section has
> something still there from 2004. Saying “we want patches” is one thing, but
> if they’re not accepted then contributors will feel unwelcome and will move
> on.
>
> $ svn log -r31303:HEAD http://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/libs/ | grep -i
> 'patch by'  | wc -l
>       93
>
> So at least 93 patches have been accepted in the last year.  Some
> committers forget to put 'Patch by', or put 'submitted by' or something
> else in the log, so this is not complete, but it definitely refutes the
> assertion that patches are not accepted.  Looking at the runtime, I've
> committed 22 patches by other people, and the runtime is one of the smaller
> projects in the GNUstep umbrella.
>
> The bug tracker is an embarrassment.  There is no connection between GNA
> accounts (for svn) and Savannah accounts (for the bug tracker).  I tried to
> create a Savannah account twice and have failed both times.  Even if you
> do, the Savannah bug tracker is quite painful to work with (and I'm used to
> Bugzilla, so my standards are not very high when it comes to bug tracking).
>  And some people decide to file bugs on GitHub, because we also have a bug
> tracker there[1], but most committers are completely unaware of it, while
> most non-cmmitters are unaware of the Savannah one (and why would they know
> about it?  The official site for GNUstep is gna.org, so why would you
> look on savannah.gnu.org for a bug tracker?).
>
>
I agree.  We should either move our bugs to gna or move the code back to
savannah.  Does anyone have any opinions on this?


> The only times I ever see bug reports for GNUstep is when Fred emails me.
>  There's no automatic stuff, and no one is responsible for bug triage.
>  This is why I always recommend GNUstep contributors send patches to the
> mailing list, not via Savannah: patches sent to the list are reviewed and
> committed quickly.
>
> In other projects I contribute to, each category in the bug tracker has a
> mailing list associated with it, and so people get a mail when there is a
> new bug and can assign it correctly.  In GNUstep, it just gets hidden away
> until someone is bored enough to poll the bug tracker.
>
> David
>
> [1] https://github.com/gnustep/gnustep-base/issues
>
> -- Sent from my Apple II
>
>
-- 
Gregory Casamento
Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa
(240)274-9630 (Cell)
http://www.gnustep.org
http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to