Am 20.12.2013 um 16:05 schrieb David Chisnall: > On 20 Dec 2013, at 14:54, Gregory Casamento <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree. We should either move our bugs to gna or move the code back to >> savannah. Does anyone have any opinions on this? > > If we're moving anything, I'd actually be in favour of Option 3: Move > everything to GitHub. That gives us:
> > - svn or git views of the repo, so developers can use either > > - A hosting site that doesn't look like it's from the mid '90s and put people > off before they even find the code (much better visibility) > > - An easy way for people to branch / submit patches > > - Integrated code review (not great, but much better than nothing) > > - A bug tracker that isn't great, but is okay, and integrates well with the > revision control system. > > While GitHub is far from perfect, it's a lot less bad than any of the > alternatives I've seen, unless you have the manpower to host all of the > infrastructure yourself. ++ _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
