Hello Kris,
Tuesday, June 26, 2001, 11:52:03 AM, Kris Benson wrote:
> Now, while it is described as a "catch-all" domain, .org should
> technically only catch not-for-profit entities, exclusive of educational
> sites and international treaty sites, as for-profit entities, educational
> sites and international treaty sites should fall under .com (or .net if
> network infrastructure), .edu and .int respectively. These TLD's were
> intended to be mutually exclusive -- if you were a .com, you weren't a
> .org. (for fans of set theory: |COM| + |NET| + |EDU| + |INT| + |ORG| =
> |COM u NET u EDU u INT u ORG| should be true)
I don't agree with your analysis.
First of all, RFC1591 doesn't define what it means by "doesn't fit" so
it could just as easily mean doesn't fit because the name is taken
elsewhere.
.int is a relatively new creature.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo
