Can they actively refuse a transfer because that ack was not completed? What's to stop them from making that process so obtuse that nobody could ever manage to figure it out? (I can just imagine what NetSol could come up with here) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Joy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bob's Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 8:10 AM Subject: RE: Re[2]: Adobe's DNS record in Network Solutions' database has beenhijacked > Actually, the losing Registrar *can* opt to introduce their own check, if > they want to. Register.com does it for transfers (causing their fleeing > registrants no end of headache and confusion, I might add)
- RE: Adobe's DNS record in Network Solutions' databas... Marc Schneiders
- RE: Adobe's DNS record in Network Solutions' dat... Mark Jeftovic
- RE: Adobe's DNS record in Network Solutions'... Marc Schneiders
- RE: Adobe's DNS record in Network Soluti... Mark Jeftovic
- RE: Adobe's DNS record in Network Soluti... Bob's Lists
- Re[2]: Adobe's DNS record in Networ... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[2]: Adobe's DNS record i... Bob's Lists
- RE: Re[2]: Adobe's DNS record i... Marc Schneiders
- Re: Re[2]: Adobe's DNS record i... Dave Warren
- RE: Re[2]: Adobe's DNS record i... Ken Joy
- Re: Adobe's DNS record in Netwo... Dave Warren
- Re: Adobe's DNS record in Network Solutions' database has... Marc Schneiders
- Re: Adobe's DNS record in Network Solutions' databas... John Otterson
- batch changing profiles Philippe Landau
- Re: Adobe's DNS record in Network Solutions' database has... Quantum Radio
- Re: Adobe's DNS record in Network Solutions' database has... John Otterson
