At 07:05 p.m. 14/11/00 -0000, you wrote:
>Folks,
>
>This thread is getting on my wick, so I think it's time for a post...
>
>Look, I have no objection to newbie RSP's posting their questions here if
>they haven't been able to get an answer in the numerous resources provided
by
>OpenSRS. Because if it's a genuine question, it doesn't just help the RSP,
it
>helps all RSP's, and of course OpenSRS.
>
>But I honestly find it quite sad to see the suggestions people are coming up
>with here. Putting links to the docs in the sigfile? Why? It's all on the
>website, and always has been. The docs, the FAQ's, the archives, everything.
>And it's not even password-protected, it's in the clear, for *everyone* to
>see. ON THE FRONT PAGE! HELLO?
>
>If RSP's can't find them, tough. They're morons. They shouldn't be RSP's in
>the first place. What was it I said about hurdles to entry before? There's
>one for you straight away OpenSRS. Add one question to the RITE-TEST:
>
>Were you able to find the docs on opensrs.org? - Yes|No
>
>I rest my case.
>
>adam
>
Hello all.
I suggested the links on the email to help future newbie people. That's
all, just to help them and avoid to waste time (all our time) and bandwidth
of the list.
In my case. Yes. I passed the rite-test. and yes I have read the docs and
faqs already. But my initial question was not completely answer in that
documentation, that's why I asked. I honestly confess that I didn't consult
the archives Anyway.
My intention is not to waste the space of the list. So as I wrote before,
in my case I'll ask here, when I don't find answers in the sites,
faqs,archives,other list, search engines, etc,etc
Just one more thing, if when we , the new ones (at least here) decided
(after all the comments in the last day) to ask something here and you
think we still are too stupid because of that question , just ignore our
question . That simple action works in other lists.
let's go back to the normal messages of the list please.
JB
