"Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Wouldn't it make more sense to go with a third option that works the same > way our whois does now, but adds the capability to parse for no response > from crsnic and then automatically performs a local lookup on the OpenSRS > db? > Mentioning of course, in the "disclaimer", something like: "This result should not be viewed as authoritative, as the authoritative WHOIS server is not currently available." Or summat. adam
- PLEASE Fix the whois server once and for all William X. Walsh
- Re: PLEASE Fix the whois server once and for all Marc Schneiders
- Re: PLEASE Fix the whois server once and for all Ross Wm. Rader
- Re[2]: PLEASE Fix the whois server once and ... adam
- Re[2]: PLEASE Fix the whois server once and ... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[2]: PLEASE Fix the whois server o... Ross Wm. Rader
- Re[4]: PLEASE Fix the whois server ... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[2]: PLEASE Fix the whois server o... Charles Daminato
- Re[4]: PLEASE Fix the whois server ... William X. Walsh
- Re[5]: PLEASE Fix the whois ser... William X. Walsh
- Re: PLEASE Fix the whois server once and for... bill
