Hello Dave, Friday, December 08, 2000, 10:58:40 PM, you wrote: >> So what do you call putting domains on hold and suspending them when >> you have a charge back? > It's called stealing the domain from the company (RSP) that actually paid > for it, because of the actions of a third party. Stealing requires that the item belong to you when it is taken. It was not stolen from you, because you never owned it. Tangible Property analogies only go so far when dealing with services like this. The courts have already drawn such a line, for instance. You will note that even NSI has not done these famous auctions of unpaid domains, either. Why do you think ICANN stopped them from doing that? What makes this any different? NSI paid the registry just like you paid OpenSRS who paid the registry. -- Best regards, William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re[3]: deleting a ca domain William X. Walsh
- Re[3]: deleting a ca domain Derek J. Balling
- Re[4]: deleting a ca domain William X. Walsh
- Re[4]: deleting a ca domain Derek J. Balling
- Re[5]: deleting a ca domain William X. Walsh
- Re[5]: deleting a ca domain Derek J. Balling
- Re[6]: deleting a ca domain William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[5]: deleting a ca domain easygoing
- Re[7]: deleting a ca domain William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[7]: deleting a ca domain Dave Warren
- Re: Re[9]: deleting a ca domain William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[9]: deleting a ca domain Dave Warren
- Re[11]: deleting a ca domain William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[11]: deleting a ca domain Dave Warren
- Re[13]: deleting a ca domain William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[13]: deleting a ca domain Dave Warren
- Re: Re[13]: deleting a ca domain Terry Lim
- Re: Re[13]: deleting a ca domain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re[15]: deleting a ca domain William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[15]: deleting a ca domain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Re[7]: deleting a ca domain easygoing
