I doubt that or my posts would never make the list, as I am
often critical of OpenSRS policies toward the their
resellers.

But come to think about it, sometimes my posts don't make
the list.

But I don't think that is caused by editing, as I see them
in the quotes when others respond to them.  If it is caused
by editing, then it is sloppy editing.  :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Michael L. Dean
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 6:36 PM
> To: Michael L. Dean; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> Russ Goodwin
> Subject: Re: Marketing to our customers
>
>
> my remarks were seriously edited!!!  Were you
> aware that our remarks are
> truncated and edited to suit the purposes of opensrs???
> need liquidation prices on servers, etc?
> call 1-800-873-9012
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael L. Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Russ Goodwin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 11:51 AM
> Subject: Re: Marketing to our customers
>
>
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Being totally honest to our customers, in a
> naturally spamming environment
> > like the web is essential.  This means we post
> FAQ's that deal with truly
> > common concerns and issues.  Registrations are
> a public event, and
> spamming
> > is the one certainty on the web.  ICANN and
> most government agencies are
> > see,hear and tell no evil about this, and the
> laws in US are deliberately
> > loose.  WE truly have no right to privacy on
> the web.  Lets let our
> > customers know!  I'm sure most of us do.
> Looking for a "better" solution
> > means increased government interference,
> heavier regs, etc.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Russ Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:25 AM
> > Subject: Marketing to our customers
> >
> >
> > > Hi all-
> > >
> > > I think this has been discussed before, but I
> don't recall there being
> any
> > > resolution.  Late last week I registered a
> domain for a client who is
> > > pretty tech-savvy and today I received a
> message from him stating that
> > > someone was already spamming him based on
> that registration.
> > >
> > > Here is a copy of the message he received
> (details replaced with 'XXX'):
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 12:43 PM
> > > To: XXX
> > > Subject: [RE:] Domain Name: XXX.COM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We've just been notified that you have
> purchased XXX.com. Great!
> > >
> > > Now that you have your domain, wouldn't it be
> GREAT to have
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
> > > Wouldn't it even be better if you could offer
> FREE web-based email for
> > your
> > > visitors?
> > >
> > > Well now you can! For FREE!!! Using our
> web-based email, you will:
> > >
> > >     . Generate more revenue for your company!
> > >     . Get FREE advertising for your company!
> > >     . Increase the value of your domain name!
> > >     . Improve the "stickiness" of your site!
> > >     . And best of all, get email ASAP!
> > >
> > > Go to http://oemmail.com/ to get started.
> > >
> > > AOL users <a href="http://oemmail.com/";>CLICK HERE</a>
> > >
> > >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > We believe this is a useful tool and hope you can take
> > > advantage. If you would prefer not to receive email
> > > from us, please reply to this email with the word
> > > "remove" within the subject line.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > OemMail.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I informed him that he ought to consider
> using a different email address
> > > for domain registrations to make it easy to
> filter out spam.
> > >
> > > My concern is that this sort of message could
> be confusing to the retail
> > > consumers of our site who get the same
> service from us.  We do let them
> > > know that their registration info is public
> and that they may get
> spammed
> > > at their registration address(es), but I'm
> left looking for a better
> > solution.
> > >
> > > -Russ
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to