Hello storage, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 5:15:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Unfortunately though, the situation remains the same, and your sigfile > illustrates it magnificently - new.net is the single point of failure for the > namespace they created. Only in the same way that ICANN is the single point of failure for the ccTLDs and gTLDs in the existing root structure. You obviously know nothing of the levels new.net has gone to and the technical details of how their service works. I'd do some research before making such uninformed proclamations. -- Best regards, William X Walsh mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Owner, Userfriendly.com Userfriendly.com Domains The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
- Re: Re[4]: New TLDs working al... Matt Prigge
- Re[6]: New TLDs working alread... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: New TLDs working al... bill
- Re: New TLDs working already? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: New TLDs working already? Csongor Fagyal
- Re[2]: New TLDs working alread... William X. Walsh
- Re: New TLDs working already? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: New TLDs working already? storage
- Re: New TLDs working already? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: New TLDs working already? storage
- RE: Re[2]: New TLDs working al... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[2]: New TLDs working al... Ross Wm. Rader
- RE: Re[2]: New TLDs working al... Joe Baptista
- Re: New TLDs working already? storage
- RE: New TLDs working already? Asgard Hostmaster
- Re: New TLDs working already? Csongor Fagyal
- New .biz Intellectual Property (IP) Claim Service Hugh Blair
- Re: New TLDs working already? Patrick Greenwell
- Re: Re[2]: New TLDs working already? Robert L Mathews
- Re[4]: New TLDs working already? William X. Walsh
- Re[5]: New TLDs working already? William X. Walsh
