Well Spotted - Check the Original Mail Message HEADERS - to see if the REPLY
Address is the "HostMaster" one - in which case, many mail programs will
choose this address over the sender address.
That is just plain UGLY - If NSI are sending out emails like that - most
peple just hit REPLY..... - that would certainly explain the sudden rush of
"No response" failures rfo NSI...
Len Thomson
Auckland
New Zealand
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: EVIDENCE ON NSI wrongfully declining transfers
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Genie wrote:
> MESSAGE 1- FROM NSI TO CUSTOMER
> ================================ JUNE 12 AM
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <BLOCKED>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:00 AM
> > Subject: [NIC-010611.8c08] Change of Registrar Authorization Request
>
> =============================================================
> NSI CONFIRMING TO THE CUSTMER THEY RECEIVED THEIR YES!!! SAME DAY
> ================================== JUNE 12 PM
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "BLOCKED FOR CUSTOMERS PRIVACY" <BLOCKED >
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [NIC-010611.8c08]:BLOCKED FOR CUSTOMERS
PRIVACY.COM:TRANSFER=YES
I can't help noticing that the second message (the autoreply) came from
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and it has the same text as the usual NSI
hostmaster autoreplies (for new/modify templates). Did your customer by
any chance send their transfer confirmation to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]? If so, they sent it to the wrong
address, and that's why it wasn't processed.
--
Alex Bulan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network administrator
Korax Inc.
