If this is true, I give NSI one big:
SLAP *doh!*
Charles Daminato
TUCOWS Product Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Len Thomson wrote:
> Well Spotted - Check the Original Mail Message HEADERS - to see if the REPLY
> Address is the "HostMaster" one - in which case, many mail programs will
> choose this address over the sender address.
>
> That is just plain UGLY - If NSI are sending out emails like that - most
> peple just hit REPLY..... - that would certainly explain the sudden rush of
> "No response" failures rfo NSI...
>
> Len Thomson
> Auckland
> New Zealand
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:53 AM
> Subject: Re: EVIDENCE ON NSI wrongfully declining transfers
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Genie wrote:
>
> > MESSAGE 1- FROM NSI TO CUSTOMER
> > ================================ JUNE 12 AM
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <BLOCKED>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:00 AM
> > > Subject: [NIC-010611.8c08] Change of Registrar Authorization Request
> >
> > =============================================================
> > NSI CONFIRMING TO THE CUSTMER THEY RECEIVED THEIR YES!!! SAME DAY
> > ================================== JUNE 12 PM
> >
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "BLOCKED FOR CUSTOMERS PRIVACY" <BLOCKED >
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: [NIC-010611.8c08]:BLOCKED FOR CUSTOMERS
> PRIVACY.COM:TRANSFER=YES
>
>
> I can't help noticing that the second message (the autoreply) came from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and it has the same text as the usual NSI
> hostmaster autoreplies (for new/modify templates). Did your customer by
> any chance send their transfer confirmation to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]? If so, they sent it to the wrong
> address, and that's why it wasn't processed.
>
> --
> Alex Bulan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Network administrator
> Korax Inc.
>
>
>
>
