On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:

> The original thinking was that handles should not be part of the
> system because handles were broken. In fact however, it was only NSI's
> implementation of handles that were broken and we very much needed
> handles (just not broken ones).

Ross,

Could you elaborate on this a bit.  In what way did you find NSI's
implementation of handles to be broken?

Thanks,
-- 
Alex Bulan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Manager
Korax Inc.

Reply via email to