On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Ross Wm. Rader wrote: > The original thinking was that handles should not be part of the > system because handles were broken. In fact however, it was only NSI's > implementation of handles that were broken and we very much needed > handles (just not broken ones). Ross, Could you elaborate on this a bit. In what way did you find NSI's implementation of handles to be broken? Thanks, -- Alex Bulan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Manager Korax Inc.
- Re: Re[2]: contact handles and we want to have your child... cpaul
- Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your children William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your child... cpaul
- Re: contact handles and we want to have your children Chuck Hatcher
- Fw: contact handles and we want to have your children Jeff
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your child... Jim McAtee
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your child... Ross Wm. Rader
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your child... avb
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your child... Ross Wm. Rader
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your child... Phillip Beazley
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your ... Ross Wm. Rader
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your child... Scott Allan
- Re: contact handles and we want to have your children Csongor Fagyal
- Re: contact handles and we want to have your childre... Phillip Beazley
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your child... shwa
- Re: Re[4]: contact handles and we want to have your child... Phillip Beazley
