> To clarify a bit, we oppose the extra-legal grant that "sunrise" principles, > in general, afford IP interests. Our qualm isn't with specific processes or > registries in this regard, but rather with the fact that the IP community > are provided with additional rights beyond those enjoyed by a "normal" > registrant. > I don't quite understand what you mean with "IP community", but I agree that a Sunrise period may be no good thing in general. However, now that we *had* one with .info it's necessary that the registry either enforces the rules it made or just discards the results and starts over. It's not acceptable that the people not playing by the rules get thru. Kai -- Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kris Benson
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Michael L. Dean
- Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re[4]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Steve Poirier
- Re: Re[4]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Peter Kiem
- Re[6]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Ross Wm. Rader
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Philippe Landau
- Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Jay Levine
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
