Marc Schneiders wrote: > > Well, I thought .BIZ was wrong, because there was already a .BIZ in > operation. So I decided *not* to do any ICANN .BIZ. What stopped > Tucows from not doing .INFO? Well, aside from Tucows being a shareholder in Afilias... Besides, the .biz in existence isn't reason to not offer it -- this .biz is globally resolvable, and the other one ain't. And here's another episode of "The Young and the .info-less..." (or is it "As the .info Turns"?): http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/21540.html -kb -- Kris Benson ABC Communications +1 (250)612-5270 x14 +1 (888)235-1174 x14
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Dave Warren
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Scott Allan
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Swerve
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Elliot Noss
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Marc Schneiders
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kris Benson
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Michael L. Dean
- Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re[4]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .inf... Steve Poirier
- Re: Re[4]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .inf... Peter Kiem
- Re[6]: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) William X Walsh
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Ross Wm. Rader
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
- Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info) Kai Schaetzl
