Thursday, Thursday, December 20, 2001, 2:24:21 PM, Robert L Mathews wrote:
> At 12/20/01 10:55 AM, Scott Allan wrote: >>We generally do not publicly disclose product development phases for many >>reasons (although, clearly, they are generally far from covert or >>secret). One of the common reasons we do not talk about these things is >>that we are often in binding non-disclosure agreements with other >>parties/suppliers. There are also competitive reasons and general bandwidth >>reasons that we use to carefully select what we test, and when and how we >>talk about it. > But the accusation is that you guys have taken ownership of a number of > expired domains and resold them to a third party without going through > resellers or the standard registry process to do so. That's a general > question with serious implications that should not violate any NDA to > answer. > So, again, the question: has OpenSRS taken ownership of any expired > domains and sold them to a third party without going through resellers or > the standard registry drop process? I also would like a direct answer to this. I'm withholding judgement, giving Scott and the others the benefit of the doubt, and I understand the need to keep somethings under wraps until a product is developed, but this is sounding very much like something that I would have grave concerns about seeing a registrar, and quite particularly a registrar whose focus is the wholesale market, engaging in. -- Best regards, William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Webcertificates.info SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea
