Saturday, Saturday, December 22, 2001, 8:43:40 PM, Abel Wisman wrote: > It was entertaing, to read it all. > It was demoralizing to see the eight of some horses. > It was great the way Scott answered
> and let us all be honest : A customer that gets 3 emails saying his domain > will expire, then a final one (if you are that concious) to point out the > deletion coming up, and then does NOT renew does NOT WANT that particular > domain anymore. That's not the point. And if you really don't see that, after all that's been said, and can say that the above justifies the actions in question, then it's probably not worth trying to explain it further to you, as you've already made up your mind that you have no ethical concerns in that situation. Many of us (most seemingly) have an ethical issue with it. And I would bet the general public would too. I know that in a post to the DNSO GA list on this, the responses were negative, and definitely said that if necessary, to prevent another registrar from attempting it in the future, that a policy on deleted domains should be developed by ICANN. The only policy now is that the registrars much follow such a policy if one is ever developed by ICANN. I think that the time to do that is probably now. -- Best regards, William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --
