> The fact of the matter is, that there is uncertainty in the current > system, which provides a much greater level of fairness than anything > else that has been proposed. And that no other system presented, NO > OTHER SYSTEM PRESENTED, is more fair than the current one. >
William that is SO easy: - announce the domains to-be-dropped - let people sign up for it for a week or so - then randomly draw one - simple, cheap and fair Please tell me what's unfair about this? Tell me what's unfair about randomness? It's the exact same situation as with the info and biz starts. Just that they had those stupid Sunrise periods. Because all those dropping names are known there *is* no FCFS, FCFS implicits that someone needs to come up with the name first, it's not just that he's the first to register it. With a dropping name it's not a matter of thinking up the name but just who's a better "hunter" (including skills, technology and money). (Don't repeat your "uncertainty" argument, there's also some uncertainty in hunting ...) Kai -- Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
