There is nothing that we can really do over the weekend for this case. We can wake up the entirety of the support/ops/dev staff, but only compliance/disputes can handle this.
Additionally, *we* didn't *do* this to him. *We* didn't *give* your customer's domain away It's also hard to track down - the original order was for "Jason Ingram", the domain is currently owned by "Jason Ingram". A recent renewal was made by the current registrant (or the renewal was made while the current registrant was listed) which was March 5th; this means the domain was under the current registrants control as early as March 5th. It will have to wait until Monday, I will see if I can't contact someone to help you sooner but I can't make any promised. Charles Daminato TUCOWS Product Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, David Denney wrote: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:48:38AM -0500, Charles Daminato wrote: > > hi-jacking is not deemed an emergency issue since our compliance/dispute > > folks will probably have to deal with it, and they don't work on the > > weekends (like the 24/7 support person) > > So you give my customer's domain away without proper authorization, and > that is not an emergency?? WTF _is_ an emergency? This is the SECOND > time you'v done this to him!!! > > > Charles Daminato > > -- > David Denney | D i m e n s i o n a l C o m m u n i c a t i o n s | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | DSL * Wireless * ISDN * Frame * ATM * PtP * Co-Lo | > 303-285-INET voice | http://www.dimensional.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > 888-3-DIMCOM tollfree | Based in Denver, serving the Front-Range and beyond | > > ...they can have my ssh when they pry the keyboard out of my cold, dead hands! >
