Dr. Lynn,

What do you think are the risks of having governments put members directly
on the ICANN board?  And why did you not recommend simply seeking a contract
for services from governments to obtain funding?    Doesn't the issue of
putting governments directly on the ICANN board open up a new can of worms?
Jamie


----- Original Message -----
From: "M. Stuart Lynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This (now old) CNN story involved a headline writer who does not read
> the text (I never mentioned any timeframe) and a reporter who did not
> understand my statement.
>
> What I said was that the ICANN Board has given no guidance for how it
> may or may not wish to proceed regarding new TLDs, that is, it has no
> specific plans at this time (the time of my quote). Indeed, to my
> knowledge the Board has not given any specific guidance. If I have
> missed any resolutions of the Board, please let me know.
>
> That is very different from saying that ICANN does not intend to
> pursue new TLDs ever or even soon. Only those who are desperate to
> make silly mischief could ever place such a construction on the
> English language.
>
> Stuart
>
>
> At 2:35 PM -0600 3/17/02, Jim Fleming wrote:
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "vint cerf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>  >
> >>  >It appears that people involved with ICANN are being intentionally
> >>  >distracted away from the focal point of adding more TLDs.
> >>
> >>  no, in fact Stuart Lynn has repeatedly said that even if the
> >>analysis of the first 7 new ones is incomplete he is interested in
> >more, especially sponsored type.
> >>
> >
> >http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/internet/11/20/interview.lynn.idg/?related
> >
> >"ICANN's Lynn: No new domains anytime soon"
> >
> >"At this time last year, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
> >and Numbers (ICANN) approved seven new top-level domains (TLD)
> >to compete with the original TLDs. But the organization, which
> >follows a Star Trek-like "prime directive" of ensuring the stability
> >of the Internet's Domain Name System (DNS), has no plans to go
> >beyond that. ICANN CEO Stuart Lynn explained why..."
> >
> >"...it's been 15 years since major generic TLDs were introduced..."
> >
> >----
> >
> >15 years ?....hardly true....
> >
> >.MD
> >.AM
> >.FM
> >.TV
> >.IO
> >.CD
> >
> >http://www.New.Net
> >80 generic TLDs....100+ million users....
> >http://www.Nameslinger.com
> >1000s of TLDs....
> >http://www.Name-Space.com
> >100s of TLDs....
> >
> >Will ICANN ever wake up ?...or will the geriatric root continue....
> >
> >Jim Fleming
> >http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
>
>
> --
>
> __________________
> Stuart Lynn
> President and CEO
> ICANN
> 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
> Marina del Rey, CA 90292
> Tel: 310-823-9358
> Fax: 310-823-8649
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Reply via email to