Hi all,

My customers are very upset with the current SSL certificate
registration process.  Entrust appears to be fumbling our applications.
Are you experiencing the same thing?

Here's an example (not a rant, but an anecdote):

Two weeks ago, I purchased an SSL cert and, within ten minutes, faxed
the customer's Proof of Right and Authorization letter to Entrust.  Dunn
& Bradstreet called the customer promptly and, without hinting at any
problems, hung up the telephone and DECLINED THE REQUEST.  Furthermore,
neither the customer nor myself were notified by Entrust.  Six days
later, I call Entrust to get the story and am told that an email was
sent to the authorization contact explaining that the WHOIS information
didn't match.  In fact, no such message had ever been received.  Five
minutes later, however, said message coincidentally appeared in our
inboxes.

And it continues.  Today, both myself and the authorization contact
received an email from Entrust requesting the same Authorization Letter
I had already faxed to them ten days earlier.

To conclude, this is certainly an atypical reseller arrangement.  I can
understand D&B calling the authorization contact for verification, but
Entrust should otherwise deal only with the reseller.  Until Entrust
gets its act together, I would prefer that our customers not be tipped
off to every bungling event that delays their application.

As an Equifax reseller, we paid $62 per certificate and received those
certs in roughly 24 hours.  Also, discrepencies in WHOIS contacts could
often be qualified verbally without a domain name registration update.
We now pay $99 for a service that is considerably less efficient and
less convenient.  [In OpenSRS' defense, those Equifax certs are long
gone.]

I'm sorry to be a whiner, but why isn't this any easier?  Any feedback
is welcome.

I hope this information is helpful to OpenSRS.

Dave

--

David M. Delbridge
President & CEO
Circa 3000
http://www.circa3k.com
775-832-2445


Reply via email to