These new no transfers away from Verisign within 45 days or 60 day rules
  were never agreed to buy Verisign's customers last time they renewed. 
The terms of a contract cannot be changed to extend past the original 
date without a new agreement. How can these new Terms be enforced. I 
have many customers that feel cheated By Verisign since they will be 
forced to renew a higher price. It's time for a class action suit maybe
even enforcement of RICO laws here in the US.

Alan DeRossett
Digital Starlight Communications Inc.



Charles Daminato wrote:

> BTW - the delay for the transfer (registry imposed) is 60 days :)
> 
> Charles Daminato
> OpenSRS Product Manager
> Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Wood
>>Sent: April 10, 2002 1:23 PM
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: NSI expired domain update?
>>
>>
>>
>>Just thought it would be fair to update on this situation.
>>
>>The evening I sent this email, the domain was dropped.  My SnapBack kicked
>>in and the domain was registered to me through The Domain People
>>yesterday.  Now I just have to wait 45 days to transfer it to my Tucows
>>account.
>>
>>For people interested in the specific dates:
>>
>>Domain originally expired: 2001 May 14
>>Domain appears to have been deleted by Verisign: 2002 April 3
>>Domain registered through SnapNames: 2002 April 9
>>
>>--
>>Dave Wood                          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>+----------------+-----------------------+--------------+
>>| Active Effects | www.activeeffects.com | 416-515-1599 |
>>
>>On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Dave Wood wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Good luck.  I'm still waiting for a domain to be freed by NetSol that
>>>expired in April of 2001.  I even paid for the SnapBack service figuring
>>>the domain would be released soon (paid in June I believe).  I
>>>
>>don't doubt
>>
>>>that the one year SnapBack subscription will expire before the domain is
>>>released.
>>>
>>>I think it's great that Verisign can add scams on top of scams.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> .
> 
> 


Reply via email to