> However... the manage interface CERTAINLY SHOULD have the ability to > UNLOCK a domain if the domain is locked.
Not a terrible idea. Let us consider whether this infringes on viable business models before we comment further. > Also, I noticed that you can't change the nameservers under a domain > if it is in the locked state? Was this mentioned somewhere I didn't > notice? I thought all locking did was prevent "domain slamming", not > also prevent NS changes. Yes, it's documented (the Name Locking Guide). We opted to use the existing 'registrar lock' feature for our name locking, which prevents nameserver changes (which, if you think about it, does prevent a kind of hijacking) AND actual transfers. Thanks, Ken > > D > > -- > +---------------------+-----------------------------------------+ > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Thou art the ruins of the noblest man | > | Derek J. Balling | That ever lived in the tide of times. | > | | Woe to the hand that shed this costly | > | | blood" - Julius Caesar Act 3, Scene 1 | > +---------------------+-----------------------------------------+
