Thanks Ross, I figured that would be the closest match, so I went ahead and cited it. Low and behold, looks like we may get a bit of action this time! I've already received a response stating that it will be fixed.
Thanks for the info about the hearing tomorrow. If you hear specifics from anyone, please do let me know. I'm really excited about it, and would love to look or listen in on the hearing! (Hey...I'm a small fish... This is exciting for me! I just want to hear the guy say "Planet Nic" if front of them, or see a copy of one of my pages flashed around... You know?) ;o) Best, -Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:22 AM Subject: Re: ICANN Regs > It sounds like 3.3.2 is your best bet. The problem is that unless *you* have > name (or names) with them (as the registrant) you don't have privity to the > contract, so getting enforcement will be difficult unless you get your > customers involved. > > If you decide to go this route, you may wish to collect specific complaints > and then take them directly to ICANN for action if RCOM is unresponsive. > > Standard disclaimer applies - IANAL, I did play one on TV - my employer is > definitely responsible for these comments because I can't afford a lawsuit > ;) etc... > > -rwr > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:32 PM > Subject: Re: ICANN Regs > > > > Hi Ross, > > Yes, actually I believe I've already found it. I was looking for something > > covering the Registrars responsibility > > of allowing the registrant access to a mechanism for domain data > > modifications. I believe the Registrar Agreement > > section 3.3.2 vaguely covers this. Is there anything else that you know > of? > > Register.Com has once again downed > > the interface from my web site that my customers with domains still there > at > > RCOM use to do domain management. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Mark Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:19 PM > > Subject: Re: ICANN Regs > > > > > > > The Registrar Accreditation Agreement can be found here: > > > http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm > > > > > > The various Registry agreements (including the Registry-Registrar > > > Agreements) can be found here: > http://www.icann.org/general/agreements.htm > > > > > > Was there something particular that you were looking for? (i've > memorized > > > most of them ;) > > > > > > -rwr > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Mark Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:05 PM > > > Subject: ICANN Regs > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > Does anyone know if there is a searchable version of ICANN regulations > out > > > there anywhere? > > > Thanks, > > > -Mark > > > > > > Mark Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Planet Nic http://www.planet-nic.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
