> > I'm still not convinced that the registrant - a tenant of a shared > namespace - has any NEED of privacy. There does not yet to seem to be > a demonstrated need for such, thus making this statement as a factual > statement and not just an opinion would be unwarranted. >
The key here is to balance the need for privacy that registrants perceive with the access to information that legitimate whois users perceive. Neither needs are in any way "factual" but really just a subjective determination. Pleasant compromise will likely mean higher utility and therefore $$ for the two of us (and the rest of our resellers of course ;). -rwr
