At 03:35 PM 6/12/2002 -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
>I'm still not convinced that the registrant - a tenant of a shared 
>namespace - has any NEED of privacy. There does not yet to seem to be a 
>demonstrated need for such, thus making this statement as a factual 
>statement and not just an opinion would be unwarranted.

Do you maintain, then, that lack of privacy should be the default state, 
and privacy must be justified?

Reply via email to