Wednesday, November 27, 2002, 10:00:37 PM, you wrote:
RBAK> POWERHOUSE wrote: >>For those will small children they don't want perverts to be able to get >>their address >>and find their house. If it's a P.O. Box, you just send a big red box to it >>and stake it out >>until someone walks out with the box you sent to it, then you follow them. >> RBAK> Then they shouldn't register domains. If they're not a public entity, RBAK> they don't need a brand. I don't have a "privacy view" to inject here which is the basis of this thread I suppose. But the comment above - "If they're not a public entity, they don't need a brand" has nothing to do with whether or not they need a domain name. If I owned 'tom.com' I could give out [EMAIL PROTECTED] to all of my contacts as an email address. Now if I change ISPs I don't have to worry about updating all of my friends (okay, both of my friends) and family, etc., with my [EMAIL PROTECTED] A domain name should be had by all IMO because it provides portability at the very least, to say nothing of the cool factor and future uses: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4322 ends up as a permanent and portable phone contact? My $.000000002 -tom >>It's _not_ safe on the web. Killers, Perverts, and more are out there >>roaming free, if >>they can get your address by just typing westnet.com then that is just >>asking for >>trouble. >> RBAK> Paranoia rampant.
